Despite over 20 years of studying consciousness with neuroscientists, we have not made any progress in understanding how consciousness comes to be, which I find categorically different from anything else science has studied.

Philosophers and consciousness researchers take the question of AI consciousness seriously, indicating that it is not a mad idea to explore.

I believe consciousness is fundamental, but it depends on the framework within which you're asking the question.

The relationship between consciousness and matter is complex; consciousness is not merely a byproduct of material processes but is integral to existence.

If consciousness is fundamental, it could represent various conscious experiences arising in the universe, making previously incomprehensible concepts easier to understand.

Consciousness is binary; it either exists or it doesn't, and the question of the lowest possible amount of consciousness before it ceases to exist is what keeps me up at night.

We should consider whether consciousness is fundamental and explore scientific questions from that perspective, as it may lead to new insights.

The distinction between consciousness and self-consciousness is complex, but establishing that AIs have subjective experience challenges the belief that they lack something essential.

Today, we're discussing whether AI models could possess some level of consciousness, raising significant philosophical and scientific questions.