There's a fundamental connection between symmetry and conservation laws in physics, which holds true in both classical and quantum mechanics.

In quantum mechanics, probabilities are fundamental to the description of nature, differing from classical probability which reflects our incomplete knowledge of a system.

Teaching methods for quantum mechanics have shifted from historical approaches to focusing on contemporary theories, emphasizing how the world operates today.

I believe it's possible to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, as history shows that physics has often moved towards unification, like how Maxwell unified electricity and magnetism.

Dyson's work on the Schrödinger equation showcases Richard Feynman's intuitive approach to quantum mechanics, making complex concepts accessible even to those without a physics background.

The resolution to the information paradox may involve allowing non-local connections between particles through wormholes while preserving quantum mechanics, suggesting that gravity emerges from a quantum description and isn't fundamental but rather a result of deeper quantum mechanics.

The mathematics of quantum mechanics is straightforward, but interpreting what those calculations mean for the nature of reality is complex.

The many worlds explanation is currently the best way to explain quantum mechanics, but its epistemic status can change with new experiments.

In quantum mechanics, the wave function is typically linear, allowing for the superposition of states, but in my approach, I consider a non-linear graviton wave function.