We must restrict access to dangerous technologies to prevent misuse, even if it frustrates those who want to innovate.

Open-ended scientific progress is essential for addressing existential dangers, and we should focus on improving laboratory security before conducting risky research.

The focus should be on creating knowledge that excites us, rather than just on job creation.

The NIH should adopt a more experimental approach to funding, allowing for high-risk, high-reward research that traditional models might overlook.

If we can't be confident that AI will respect and understand humanity, we must adopt a precautionary principle and avoid risky experimentation in AI design.

When formulating a research strategy, it's important to balance intuition and empiricism with formalism to maximize the chances of making significant breakthroughs.

Being open-minded and exposing yourself to a wide range of ideas is vital in research, as opportunities can arise from unexpected places.

I believe it's essential to find the positive aspects of technological change and focus on what we can keep that excites us, rather than just fearing the negative.

The precautionary principle, which advocates for caution in the face of new technologies, has often stifled innovation and led to missed opportunities for progress, as seen in the case of nuclear power.