The U.S. is facing two wars: one for intelligence supremacy and another stemming from internal instability, as economic pressures mount on American citizens.

The U.S. interventions in Indonesia and other countries often led to atrocities and the destruction of democratic foundations, driven by the goal of maintaining control over resources and political power.

In conflicts like Ukraine and Taiwan, the U.S. must recognize its limitations and avoid aggressive posturing that could lead to war.

Growing up in a dictatorship, I realized that accountability is a major issue in democracies, where bad actors can operate without consequence.

The U.S. supported Saddam Hussein for years, but after he lost control and failed to follow IMF orders, he was deemed no longer useful, leading to calls for a democratic transition.

If you invade a country, you must commit to reconstruction; abandoning efforts leads to the undoing of progress, as seen in Afghanistan.

The US needs to maintain its leadership in AI to preserve its global hegemony, which could lead to peace for Americans but may disadvantage others globally.

The U.S. must choose between fostering a collaborative approach to AI, akin to the Marshall Plan, or risk allowing adversaries like China to dominate the global AI landscape.

The decision to appease or confront aggressors like Hitler is a complex issue, with historical lessons on when diplomacy fails and military action becomes necessary.