The government has crossed a line into criminal behavior by exerting illegal pressure on companies to censor content, violating First Amendment rights.

The constitution enumerates categories of requests deemed harmful, such as making weapons of mass destruction, and harmless, like writing poems.

It's better for the Constitution to specify actions, like protecting free speech, rather than just aiming for human flourishing, which is too vague.

The original discussions around censorship focused on hate speech and misinformation, with hate speech being the first topic addressed.

We have clear community guidelines that prohibit pornography, child sexual abuse material, and violence, and we ensure that users under 18 have a more restricted experience on the platform.

The US has significantly violated both civil and political provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as highlighted in recent Amnesty International reports.

Lawsuits in the early days of Google established important legal precedents, such as the protection of search results under the First Amendment.

There is practically no internet service that can operate without some form of censorship, just as no country has unlimited free speech.

The first content policy was like a convention center where various communities could gather, but we had to draw a line against harmful content.