I believe it's possible to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, as history shows that physics has often moved towards unification, like how Maxwell unified electricity and magnetism.

The connection between quantum mechanics and gravity is a major focus in theoretical physics right now, as there are inconsistencies between the two.

The resolution to the information paradox may involve allowing non-local connections between particles through wormholes while preserving quantum mechanics, suggesting that gravity emerges from a quantum description and isn't fundamental but rather a result of deeper quantum mechanics.

The principle of equivalence in general relativity conflicts with the principle of superposition in quantum mechanics, highlighting a fundamental tension between these two theories.

We haven't unified quantum mechanics and general relativity yet because we don't know what the fundamental objects are, and we need to rethink our notions of space and time.

Quantum theory as a whole is wrong, and the role of gravity in quantum mechanics conflicts with the principle of superposition.

General Relativity is based on two foundational pillars: general covariance, meaning physical laws don't depend on coordinate choices, and the principle of equivalence, which states that gravity is the same as local acceleration.

Physics is a victim of its own success; general relativity and quantum mechanics are so effective that they cover 99.9% of observations, making it hard to find deviations to combine them.

The strength of geometric algebra lies in its ability to unify various concepts in physics, including quantum mechanics and relativity, potentially offering new insights into quantum gravity.