The history of warfare has been dominated by leaders who are insulated from the battlefield, but advancements in surveillance technology may change this dynamic.

Technological advancements have historically played a crucial role in warfare, influencing the outcomes of battles and the rise and fall of empires.

To effectively modernize warfare, we must get advanced technologies into the hands of warfighters, as seeing is believing in terms of their impact.

The military must adapt to the new generation of service members who are accustomed to advanced technology, or risk falling behind in operational effectiveness.

The conflict in Ukraine has changed the paradigm for military technology, highlighting the importance of adapting to new threats.

The history of warfare is marked by rapid technological changes, such as the transition from hand-to-hand combat to the gunpowder revolution and the evolution of aircraft in World War II.

The future of warfare may involve constant surveillance, allowing for precise targeting of individuals, which could fundamentally change how conflicts are conducted.

The conflict of ideas is central to warfare, and understanding this can lead to better strategies than just physical force.

The technologies that matter most to the future of warfare are right in front of us, and the security challenge is whether we can mobilize the bureaucracy to operationalize autonomy technologies effectively.