The government has crossed a line into criminal behavior by exerting illegal pressure on companies to censor content, violating First Amendment rights.

Companies are often victims of government pressure, but those funded by the government may find themselves in a precarious position regarding censorship.

Government should not exert any form of pressure on companies to censor, as it undermines the principles of free speech, and this administrative power is exemplified by Facebook's Libra project, which faced threats from senators warning banks against collaborating with them, highlighting the use of state power without formal laws or regulations.

Government pressure on companies can lead to severe consequences, and CEOs often find themselves under intense scrutiny from multiple fronts.

The intertwining of government and large corporations creates a situation where companies must comply with government demands to avoid scrutiny and potential penalties.

If we start an internet company, we cannot allow illegal content, which means we will inevitably have a censorship mechanism in place.

When the government holds power over social media platforms, there's a risk that it could be misused for political or financial gain, undermining our freedoms.

Once a censorship system is established, it can be pressured to expand its scope beyond illegal content to include other topics.

The government can exert pressure on private banks to debank individuals, effectively creating a privatized sanctions regime against American citizens.