When I criticize Israel's actions, I often face backlash from people who don't realize I'm Jewish, which complicates the conversation.

When someone like Netanyahu does an interview, it's a way for him to share his perspective, which I think is a good thing. In a war, especially with Russia, it's important to understand the other side's perspective, even if you don't take it as gospel.

Criticism of Israel often leads to accusations of being a self-hating Jew or a Nazi apologist, which is insane given the context of the discussion.

I avoid discussing the substances I use because it can lead to misconceptions about achieving my physique.

Criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic, but when individuals express outrage over Israel while ignoring atrocities against Muslims elsewhere, it indicates a deeper bias.

The goal of my podcast is to have conversations that historians will find useful in the future, which can be challenging because you risk being punished for revealing too much information.

The dynamics of the Israel-Palestine conflict are complicated by extremists on both sides who seem to undermine their own causes.

The perception that the Israeli government is responsible for all regional issues is a simplistic and low-resolution view of a complex geopolitical landscape.

Netanyahu likely feels the need to engage in the internet conversation to influence the narrative, especially as younger generations view Israel differently due to the ongoing war.