The idea that we live in a simulation doesn't add anything meaningful; the laws of nature themselves can be seen as a computer program that governs our reality.

Some people believe the universe is a simulation, but I argue that the complexity of reality, especially in quantum mechanics, makes that unlikely.

The simulation theory posits that we may be living in a virtual reality, where our perception of reality is influenced by observation.

I don't find the argument that AI cannot be conscious due to its lack of biological components compelling, as consciousness may not be limited to biological systems; if you can simulate a human brain with high fidelity, it's likely that there would be some kind of conscious experience present.

Today, we're discussing whether AI models could possess some level of consciousness, raising significant philosophical and scientific questions.

The universe is efficient, and there are two reasons why I believe it is not a simulation: the incredible computational numbers involved and the question of why a superintelligent being would simulate humans, who often act irrationally.

Philosophers and consciousness researchers take the question of AI consciousness seriously, indicating that it is not a mad idea to explore.

The most unsettling idea about consciousness is how non-conscious matter in the universe can configure to create an experience of being from the inside, and the mystery of how that transition occurs keeps me up at night.

In game design, the most compelling experiences arise from the gaps between reality and simulation, allowing players to reflect on their actions and decisions.