The government aims to create a regulatory environment that favors a few large companies in AI, effectively stifling competition from new entrants.

Emerging technologies must be able to build without fear of arbitrary self-preferencing by large companies, which can stifle competition and innovation.

Legislation aimed at controlling AI could impose personal liability on model builders, which may stifle innovation and lead to excessive control.

A national ban on non-compete agreements is essential to unlock innovation and allow talent to flow freely between companies, as seen in California's effective ban.

It's crucial for startups to have an authentic voice in policy discussions, especially when their interests may not align with those of big tech companies.

For the last 15 years, technology policy in Washington D.C. has been dominated by a few large companies, often sidelining the voices of startups.

We need to establish guardrails for AI development instead of trying to stop its progress in a globally competitive market.

To address government overreach, voters must elect representatives who oppose such actions, and there needs to be transparency about past censorship practices, including investigations and potential prosecutions for those responsible.

The legislation surrounding TikTok is seen as an egregious violation of civil liberties, similar to the Patriot Act, as it allows the government to designate companies as foreign adversaries without recourse.