The apocalyptic fear surrounding science and technology has led to a risk-averse society, where taboo ideas are often dismissed without discussion.

There's a strong negative reaction to discussions about GLP-1 medications because they challenge established beliefs about fitness and nutrition, threatening the status of many professionals in the health industry.

The lockdown during the pandemic highlighted the dangers of censorship and the need for open discourse to understand critical issues.

The replication crisis in science highlights the need for rigorous testing and validation of research findings to ensure their reliability and applicability. We can't allow ourselves to go too far in one direction or the other; let's take a look at all these vaccines in a controlled manner. What do we lose by looking at them? Nothing.

The fear of apocalyptic consequences from scientific endeavors and a desire to escape into abstraction have contributed to this stagnation.

Vaccines can cause an inflammatory response, and in rare cases, this response may impact neurodevelopment in susceptible individuals, particularly those with pre-existing conditions.

Censorship of theories regarding the origins of COVID-19 marked a turning point, revealing how far the censorship regime had spiraled out of control.

The precautionary principle, which advocates for caution in the face of new technologies, has often stifled innovation and led to missed opportunities for progress, as seen in the case of nuclear power.

Many vaccines that could exist, like for Lyme disease, do not due to market failures and safety concerns, indicating a need for advanced market commitments to stimulate development in these areas.