I feel grateful for the opportunity to lead OpenAI, but the experience has been more overwhelming than I initially anticipated.

An OpenAI employee named Dan encouraged me to return to Google, highlighting that this is a transformative moment in computer science.

In a recent exchange with an OpenAI representative, it became clear that no one had previously challenged their practices, highlighting a culture where high-integrity individuals might leave if asked to engage in unethical actions.

Meta views OpenAI as their biggest competitor, and I respect their aggressive approach to innovation, even if their current AI efforts haven't met expectations.

Investing in OpenAI in 2018 felt simple because I had a strong belief in AI, despite the investment being unconventional and lacking a clear business plan.

The non-disparagement clause at OpenAI, which prevents former employees from criticizing the company, seems to have been an obvious bluff, as it restricts free speech without any real legal backing.

Many former OpenAI employees may not have fully understood the implications of the non-disparagement agreement they signed, often feeling pressured to comply without reading the fine print.

I funded OpenAI with around 50 million dollars, intending it to be an open-source, non-profit organization to counter the closed-source, for-profit model of companies like Google.

When we started OpenAI, I was convinced that deep learning was genuinely working and that it improved with scale. This realization was crucial because it seemed like others weren't recognizing its potential.