Civil wars are devastating and often result in the destruction of one's own infrastructure, even if fought for a good reason.

Most wars throughout history were fought between kings, queens, and dictators, not between major democracies, suggesting that the spread of technology could lead to less intense and less frequent conflicts.

The loss of a unifying enemy like Carthage contributed to the breakdown of political cohesion in Rome, allowing for civil wars and the rise of personalist armies.

War is fundamentally about human beings and their relationships, not just political or economic factors.

The conflict of ideas is central to warfare, and understanding this can lead to better strategies than just physical force.

In the midst of war, you see the very best and the very worst of people, and they exist beside each other.

Using World War II as a reference for modern conflicts is problematic because it prevents us from seeing our enemies as real people with genuine grievances, which is essential for understanding the complexities of war.

Avoiding civil war is crucial, but sacrificing core values to prevent it raises the question of whether the cost is worth it.

Modern wars are no longer just about resources; they encompass various conflicts across different domains, and international organizations are struggling to fulfill their roles effectively.