Alien civilizations may not have malicious intentions; they could simply view us as obstacles rather than threats.

When we encounter extraterrestrial life, they will likely have evolved from predators and possess the ability to manipulate their environment and communicate.

There could be a laser superhighway in space, allowing aliens to travel across the galaxy, and we might be too limited in our understanding to recognize it.

Life in the universe could take forms vastly different from humans, potentially existing without technology or social structures, and may not prioritize expansion or conquest.

I believe there's a fundamental difference between a humanity that explores multiple planets and one that remains confined to Earth until extinction.

The first question I would ask AGI is about the existence of alien civilizations, exploring the implications of their presence or absence.

Given that we've identified 4,000 exoplanets orbiting other stars, it's rather ridiculous to believe that we're the only civilization in the universe.

The alien hypothesis suggests that advanced beings may not need physical strength or gender, communicating telepathically instead, which eliminates the primal urges we have to conquer and spread our DNA.

If we don't become a multi-planetary species, we risk facing calamities that could threaten humanity's existence on Earth.