Companies are often victims of government pressure, but those funded by the government may find themselves in a precarious position regarding censorship.

The cultural shift in the Democratic Party has led to a perception that philanthropy is now viewed negatively, as it represents individual choice rather than government allocation of resources.

The contrarian question for nonprofits is to identify great causes that are unpopular, as those are often underfunded and impactful.

When the government holds power over social media platforms, there's a risk that it could be misused for political or financial gain, undermining our freedoms.

Founders should communicate transparently with stakeholders about spending, especially after raising significant funds, to avoid misallocating resources.

I would pay more taxes if I knew it would improve the lives of people in this country, but I doubt the government is effective at spending it.

The troubling reality is that those who truly run the government are not the elected officials we vote for, but rather a cabal of elites within the Democratic Party, including figures like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, who influence decisions behind the scenes.

To address government overreach, voters must elect representatives who oppose such actions, and there needs to be transparency about past censorship practices, including investigations and potential prosecutions for those responsible.

The current administration has extended the concept of debanking to tech founders and political opponents, creating a chilling effect on innovation and entrepreneurship.