Breakthroughs in science may be based on incorrect assumptions, highlighting the need to question established beliefs.

The scientific community often struggles to integrate new discoveries into existing models, preferring to fit new information into pre-existing frameworks rather than allowing the data to guide the narrative.

As science advances, it expands the boundaries of philosophy, allowing us to learn new things and refine our understanding of universal truths.

Empirical learning is not as widely understood as it should be, and we discover new ideas by experimenting with different methods.

The reliance on metaphysical presuppositions in science is often questioned, leading to a disconnect between scientific inquiry and its ethical implications.

I think it's a mistake to assume that academic research can easily change people's minds; often, it doesn't lead to a shift in beliefs.

I believe there is so much in nature that we have yet to leverage and understand, and much of our work is about unveiling new truths about the natural world.

Letting go of preconceived notions and embracing the unknown opens doors to new possibilities and creative endeavors.

The future of science may involve rethinking our ability to experience systems beyond our current perceptions, such as the earth's magnetic field.