The discussion around bootstrapping versus venture capital should focus on the realities of business needs rather than sensationalized stories that misrepresent the funding landscape.

The decision to bootstrap or seek venture capital is crucial; most entrepreneurs do not rely on VC funding.

Engagement bait often highlights extreme examples of funded startups to provoke outrage, but it's essential to avoid getting emotionally involved in these narratives.

Bootstrapping allows you to maintain ownership and equity, spend more efficiently, and avoid repaying loans or answering to investors, but it limits your growth potential and increases financial risk.

Bootstrapping means starting a company without raising venture capital, using personal funds or business revenue instead. This approach gives you complete control over your business.

The current era of venture capital is characterized by a need for power, as startups require strong backing to succeed in a competitive landscape.

No one is forcing you to start a VC-backed company; if you prefer bootstrapping, that's a valid choice and can be revisited later if needed.

Venture capital has historically been overfunded, which creates a competitive environment where founders often face multiple venture capitalists vying for their attention.

The venture capital industry often promotes the idea that founders need to raise money immediately, which can lead to poor decision-making and unfavorable terms for founders.