The struggle for supremacy between major powers could escalate into conflict, especially in a world with nuclear capabilities, which poses a significant risk to global stability.

The rise of sovereign AI reflects a historical pattern where the control of technology and data centers translates into significant geopolitical power.

The year 2030 is seen as a pivotal moment, with various powers positioning themselves for control before significant changes occur.

The current political climate reflects a historical pattern of resentment and conflict, which can escalate if not addressed thoughtfully.

In conflicts like Ukraine and Taiwan, the U.S. must recognize its limitations and avoid aggressive posturing that could lead to war.

America's military power is often overstated; in a nuclear escalation, the U.S. is not as superior as perceived, as all nations would face catastrophic consequences.

If peace is rushed, the most likely outcome is that the person who can be pressured most easily will be the one who is pressured, potentially rewarding the aggressor.

Physical power underpins all societal structures, and without it, attempts to exercise political power fail. This is evident in the history of communist revolutions, which often end up being controlled by those with physical power, leading to inequality.

People rise to positions of power by mastering psychological tactics, such as playing the game of optics and intimidation.