The modern environmental movement identifies the correct problem of finite resources but fails to propose appealing solutions for economic growth. To make clean technologies cost competitive, we need to massively lower their prices through subsidies and innovation until the innovation curve is crossed.

The green economy initiatives have often been misdirected, benefiting the wealthy rather than addressing climate issues effectively.

The left is fundamentally more skeptical of unchecked capitalism than the right, believing that unchecked capitalism can lead to exploitation and environmental harm.

There are no solutions, only trade-offs; you can't solve everything in life without making compromises.

Environmental policies that prioritize the planet over the poor can lead to dire consequences for vulnerable populations.

The environmental narrative often presents a false dichotomy, suggesting that addressing climate issues requires making people poorer.

The policies that were once necessary to protect the environment now hinder the development of sustainable solutions like dense housing and nuclear power, which are essential for a prosperous future.

Socialism often stems from a desire for compassion, but capitalism is rooted in rationality. While there are flaws in capitalism, the solution lies in providing equal opportunities rather than enforcing equal outcomes through coercion. With my family, I adopt a communist perspective; with close friends, I'm a socialist; at the state level, I lean towards being a Democrat; at higher levels, I identify as a Republican; and at the federal level, I consider myself a libertarian. The larger the group, the less trust there is, leading to more cheating and misaligned incentives. In smaller groups, like a kibbutz or commune, being a socialist is more appropriate.

Political problems are often best addressed by focusing on small, manageable issues rather than attempting to tackle larger, more contentious debates directly.