Raising more money can be beneficial for a founder's mission, as it can mean the difference between success and failure, even if it leads to some dilution.

Raising more capital can be beneficial, as long as founders maintain control over spending and prioritize scrappiness.

Nowadays, with an abundance of capital, investors have a greater incentive to convince founders they need more money, often using fear of not having enough as a tactic.

If investors are dictating actions to a founder, it indicates a deeper problem within the company structure that needs to be addressed.

It's important to understand the implications of raising a large round, such as giving up control and how it affects future fundraising and equity distribution.

Many founders mistakenly believe that fundraising is about more than just raising money to build a successful company, which can lead to misalignment with investor expectations.

Founder breakups can become contentious if founders haven't paid themselves, leading to leverage for the fired founder in negotiations.

Great founders are often unbalanced in their commitment, pouring everything into their venture, especially during the early years when the stakes are high.

A common misconception among founders is that raising money will magically solve all their problems. They may believe that their investors will save them from failure, which leads to a lack of critical thinking and preparation for ongoing challenges.