The strategy for a responsible actor is to reach AGI first, then focus on safety to maintain their lead over competitors.

If you're building AGI, you shouldn't publish your research, as it aids less responsible actors in their own AGI development.

While one company or entity may reach AGI first, it's likely that multiple organizations will achieve significant advancements around the same time due to the competitive nature of AI development.

The development of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) will require careful consideration of how its benefits and decision-making processes are shared among society, ensuring equitable access and influence.

Even if AI development takes longer than expected, it won't necessarily be detrimental, although it may incur high costs for some companies.

There is a delicate balance between being excited about AGI and the apprehension that comes with OpenAI's role in its development, which raises concerns about unilateral decision-making in AI governance.

Historically, I've supported secrecy in AGI development to prevent rivals from stealing ideas.

Investing in a startup that claims to have discovered the secret to artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a mistake; progress will come from collective research, not a single entity.

It's crucial to improve information security when developing artificial general intelligence (AGI).