The U.S. is the primary destination for the best and brightest, and we should consider attaching green cards to technical degrees to retain talent.

Our education system is capable of attracting international talent, yet it struggles to adequately educate native-born Americans for high-skilled jobs.

The argument for high-skilled immigration is straightforward: it allows the U.S. to attract smart individuals from around the world, enhancing productivity and innovation across industries.

My advice to improve U.S. manufacturing includes a balanced immigration policy that attracts skilled engineers and scientists to stay in the U.S. and contribute to the economy, rather than sending them back to their home countries after training.

High-skilled immigrants not only benefit themselves and the tech industry but also create new companies and technologies that generate jobs for native-born Americans.

There is a significant disconnect between the talent flow from rural areas and high-tech industries, which raises questions about the systemic barriers faced by these communities.

The H-1B visa debate reflects broader concerns about immigration and its impact on the economy and workforce, and I have a nuanced view on high-skilled immigration, shaped by my experiences in Silicon Valley and my advocacy for more H-1B visas, which I believe have significantly benefited the U.S.

The exclusion of native-born individuals from high-skilled jobs and educational opportunities is a consequence of high-skilled immigration policies.

Cultural issues in America contribute to a lack of high achievement among native-born individuals, which complicates the immigration debate.