Building a startup is about learning and iterating. Most successful products evolve after launch based on user feedback, so starting with a minimum viable product is crucial for this process.

We aimed to minimize technical risks by testing with a minimum viable product (MVP) before investing heavily in development. This approach helps determine if there's a product-market fit without wasting resources.

Once you have a prototype and user interest, the next step is to build a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) that can be launched quickly, ideally within weeks.

The term 'minimum viable product' (MVP) emphasizes that a product must be useful enough to serve a purpose for customers; a product that is completely useless is not viable.

Startups should focus on developing a minimally viable product that can be productized and brought to market, rather than just a minimally viable prototype.

The myth of the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) can be dangerous; it's crucial to focus on true signals in product development rather than just launching a basic version.

A minimum viable product is irrelevant if it does not solve a valuable problem; ensure that your product's viability aligns with its value.

It's essential for founders to launch early with a minimal viable product (MVP) because the downside is low, and it allows for adjustments as the company grows.

The key to transforming an initial spark of an idea into a successful startup is to work together to build and launch a Minimum Viable Product (MVP).