The environmental regulations and adversarial legalism that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s have made it increasingly difficult to build necessary infrastructure, leading to a decline in growth initiatives.

The policies that were once necessary to protect the environment now hinder the development of sustainable solutions like dense housing and nuclear power, which are essential for a prosperous future.

Regulatory barriers are hindering the construction of essential energy infrastructure, such as nuclear and natural gas power plants, at a time when energy is critically needed.

The rise of NIMBYism, or 'not in my backyard' attitudes, has led to a significant decline in housing permits in progressive areas, as regulations and laws empower citizens to block new developments.

The current administration has improved the process for building and launching facilities, but we still face significant delays in obtaining permits and energy connections in California.

In the nuclear technology sector, despite the potential for innovation, the regulatory environment has not approved a new reactor design in over 50 years, making it difficult to implement better solutions.

The modern environmental movement identifies the correct problem of finite resources but fails to propose appealing solutions for economic growth. To make clean technologies cost competitive, we need to massively lower their prices through subsidies and innovation until the innovation curve is crossed.

The current era is marked by unprecedented social and environmental challenges, and we must actively work to address these issues as we advance technologically.

The clean energy industry has gained significant government support, driven by fears of environmental collapse.