Netanyahu's leadership is scrutinized due to the October 7th attacks occurring under his watch, similar to how Golda Meir was held accountable for the Yom Kippur War.

Many in Israel believed Hamas was content with corruption and governance, underestimating their ideological commitment to violence.

Criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic, but when individuals express outrage over Israel while ignoring atrocities against Muslims elsewhere, it indicates a deeper bias.

Despite initial fears that hostages taken by Hamas would be dead, most have been returned due to the actions of Netanyahu and the Israeli government, which also significantly degraded Hamas's capabilities.

The argument that Hamas loves death more than life contrasts sharply with the Israeli approach, which claims to prioritize life, yet results in significant civilian casualties.

Despite criticisms, many political leaders in Israel would likely have responded similarly to the October 7th attacks as Netanyahu did, given the circumstances.

Even if Hamas is a fanatical organization, the argument that they need to be eliminated overlooks the fact that the people of Gaza are suffering under dire conditions and have been for generations.

Netanyahu likely feels the need to engage in the internet conversation to influence the narrative, especially as younger generations view Israel differently due to the ongoing war.

The perception that the Israeli government is responsible for all regional issues is a simplistic and low-resolution view of a complex geopolitical landscape.