You can ridicule ideas without hurting anyone, and being offended is not a valid argument against criticism.

Criticism is essential for growth; it helps individuals recognize their flaws and provides a pathway for improvement.

Criticism is essential for democracy, and I welcome it as it helps improve governance. However, I differentiate between genuine criticism and mere allegations, which can lead to unnecessary conflicts.

Understanding the role of religion in society is crucial, as it influences people's beliefs and behaviors, and the lack of genuine belief can result in harmful substitutes.

Criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic, but when individuals express outrage over Israel while ignoring atrocities against Muslims elsewhere, it indicates a deeper bias.

The decline of religion has led to a radical subjectivity in society, where personal outcomes are often viewed as solely determined by individual actions, neglecting the role of a higher moral order.

The distinction between science and religion is crucial; problems arise when scientists comment on ethics or religious figures on natural laws.

I don't believe in spirituality, but personal belief has never been a danger. Dogma is the dangerous part, and it exists in many places, not just religion.

I welcome criticism because I believe it is the soul of democracy.