The U.S. military's reliance on exquisite systems has created a disparity in drone production capabilities compared to adversaries like China, which can produce drones at a much larger scale.

The asymmetry in warfare is evident when a drone costing a few thousand dollars can take out a system worth millions, a reality that the U.S. military has yet to fully address.

Only superior military technology can credibly deter war, and we have more companies interested in supporting that mission than ever before.

The tools and systems we develop for the military often feed back into our commercial business, demonstrating the dual-use nature of our technology, and we're seeing a flywheel effect in various domains like aviation and maritime, where investments in autonomy will benefit commercial sectors as well.

During my time in the Air Force, I witnessed the early stages of drone technology and its potential impact on modern warfare.

The military-industrial complex's influence extends beyond just profit; it shapes public sentiment and policy, complicating peace efforts.

Dual-use technology in logistics allows for collaboration between the military and commercial sectors, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness.

Investing in defense tech is booming, but the market is not as limitless as it seems; there are mature and emergent competitors, and the available budget is often more constrained than perceived.

Current drone light shows rely heavily on GPS and communication links, which are vulnerable to jamming on the modern battlefield, making them less relevant for military operations.