In the film Ex Machina, the embodiment of AI is crucial, as it explores the philosophical implications of human attraction and empathy towards artificial intelligence.

Movies like "Her" and "Ex Machina" effectively explore the potential consequences of AI, highlighting both its benefits and risks.

The portrayal of AI in movies often prioritizes storytelling over accuracy, leading to misconceptions about the capabilities and nature of real-world AI. Asimov wrote the laws of robotics to create compelling science fiction stories, but these laws are not practical for real-world applications in robotics.

The evolution of AI in film has shifted from utopian visions to more dystopian narratives, reflecting societal fears and concerns about technology.

The ending of Ex Machina leaves many questions unanswered, such as whether Ava is truly conscious or just a machine, emphasizing the film's ambiguity about AI and consciousness. It is intentionally vague, leaving viewers questioning the consciousness of the AI character, Ava.

The gel used to depict Ava's brain in Ex Machina was a good choice, as we currently lack the technology to create lifelike artificial intelligence like hers.

Regardless of the medium, the key to AI content is whether there's a compelling story and a relatable person behind it.

The perception of AI as either a utopia or dystopia is a false dichotomy; instead, AI should be viewed as a normal technology that integrates into everyday life, similar to electricity or the internet.

One of my favorite lines in Ex Machina is when Caleb points out that the real Turing test doesn't reveal whether the entity is human or machine, highlighting the film's exploration of consciousness.