Humor serves as a coping mechanism for our ultimate sorrows, something AI lacks the capacity to engage with meaningfully.

While AI can augment human creativity, it cannot master humor, as humor is inherently a human judgment.

The aim of my AI research was to give AI a sense of humor, but it failed because it couldn't understand complex images and humor, often producing only mediocre results rather than deep, meaningful human humor.

I find humor to be a way to engage people in considering the implications of technology, allowing for a more thoughtful response rather than immediate judgment.

The emotional connection and human experience in creative endeavors are aspects that AI may struggle to replicate, emphasizing the value of human creativity in art and storytelling.

To navigate the unsettling rise of AI, we must focus on what truly matters: human connection, presence, and the ability to engage in meaningful conversations.

AI is a tool that can be used creatively, but it should not replace human judgment in determining what is funny or valuable in art.

The irony of AI is that while it can perform tasks efficiently, it may exacerbate feelings of insecurity and loneliness in society.

AI is not yet capable of replicating the emotional connections and nuances of human interaction, particularly in fields like therapy, which require deep human empathy.