A human sense of humor is rooted in vulnerability and the existential questions of life, which AI cannot address effectively.

While AI can augment human creativity, it cannot master humor, as humor is inherently a human judgment.

The aim of my AI research was to give AI a sense of humor, but it failed because it couldn't understand complex images and humor, often producing only mediocre results rather than deep, meaningful human humor.

I find humor to be a way to engage people in considering the implications of technology, allowing for a more thoughtful response rather than immediate judgment.

If you can't joke about the most horrendous things in the world, what's the point of jokes? Humor is to get us over terrible things.

The irony of AI is that while it can perform tasks efficiently, it may exacerbate feelings of insecurity and loneliness in society.

AI is not yet capable of replicating the emotional connections and nuances of human interaction, particularly in fields like therapy, which require deep human empathy.

AI is a tool that can be used creatively, but it should not replace human judgment in determining what is funny or valuable in art.

The future of technology could allow us to address mental health issues by enhancing positive emotional states, but it may also eliminate the rawness of human experience, including art and comedy.