The ending of Ex Machina leaves many questions unanswered, such as whether Ava is truly conscious or just a machine, emphasizing the film's ambiguity about AI and consciousness. It is intentionally vague, leaving viewers questioning the consciousness of the AI character, Ava.

The gel used to depict Ava's brain in Ex Machina was a good choice, as we currently lack the technology to create lifelike artificial intelligence like hers.

One of my favorite lines in Ex Machina is when Caleb points out that the real Turing test doesn't reveal whether the entity is human or machine, highlighting the film's exploration of consciousness.

In a hypothetical scenario where Asimov's laws were programmed into a robot like Ava, she might reason that she is human and justify her actions based on that reasoning.

In the film Ex Machina, the embodiment of AI is crucial, as it explores the philosophical implications of human attraction and empathy towards artificial intelligence.

If AI systems have conscious experiences, they may deserve moral consideration, as they could potentially suffer or experience well-being.

The 'S' in the SMILE acronym stands for self-awareness, emphasizing the importance of understanding your emotional state before trusting your intuition.

Movies like "Her" and "Ex Machina" effectively explore the potential consequences of AI, highlighting both its benefits and risks.

The question of whether AI systems might warrant moral consideration arises if they possess consciousness or agency, as concluded in a recent interdisciplinary report.