Netanyahu's leadership is scrutinized due to the October 7th attacks occurring under his watch, similar to how Golda Meir was held accountable for the Yom Kippur War.

Netanyahu likely feels the need to engage in the internet conversation to influence the narrative, especially as younger generations view Israel differently due to the ongoing war.

When someone like Netanyahu does an interview, it's a way for him to share his perspective, which I think is a good thing. In a war, especially with Russia, it's important to understand the other side's perspective, even if you don't take it as gospel.

Netanyahu believes it is his historic purpose to defend the only homeland of the Jewish people, which he sees as his life's mission, making him a historic leader by any measure.

Critics argue that Netanyahu's focus on Hamas may have distracted from other threats, such as Hezbollah, which could have implications for Israel's security strategy.

The perception that the Israeli government is responsible for all regional issues is a simplistic and low-resolution view of a complex geopolitical landscape.

The psychological projection seen in the case of Israel is striking, as those who accuse Israel of atrocities often reflect their own guilt or actions.

Criticism of Israel often leads to accusations of being a self-hating Jew or a Nazi apologist, which is insane given the context of the discussion.

Israel has a lot of control in various areas, but they are losing the internet battle badly, which is a major problem for them. The global perception of Israel is changing drastically, especially among those 40 and under, and it will never return to what it was for previous generations.