The conflict of ideas is central to warfare, and understanding this can lead to better strategies than just physical force.

To address the issues of war and violence, we might need to engineer out the human reward systems that drive resource acquisition and conflict.

War is fundamentally about human beings and their relationships, not just political or economic factors.

Using World War II as a reference for modern conflicts is problematic because it prevents us from seeing our enemies as real people with genuine grievances, which is essential for understanding the complexities of war.

The notion that resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would solve all global injustices is preposterous, as it overlooks the complexities of regional politics and history.

I believe in a world where we can resolve conflicts without resorting to war, which is why I value democracies.

If we make everyone out to be monsters, we lose the ability to negotiate and find diplomatic solutions, which is crucial for resolving conflicts.

The lessons from World War II highlight the dangers of allowing individuals to wield unchecked power, leading to catastrophic decisions and consequences.

Failure to contain AI could result in a proliferation of power among bad actors, leading to significant harm and destabilization of our world.