In Singapore, the absence of historians focusing on its own history reflects a broader trend of self-censorship in discussing sensitive topics, similar to dynamics in China.

The dynamics of censorship in China have evolved, with increased scrutiny on individuals amplifying dissenting voices, particularly those connected to exiled dissidents.

The perception of safety for journalists in China has shifted, with increased risks for those connected to dissidents or critical of the government, reflecting a tightening grip on freedom of expression.

Censorship in modern China operates through fear, friction, and flooding, making it difficult for citizens to access information that contradicts the government's narrative.

The black box nature of the Chinese Communist Party's operations makes it difficult for journalists to operate in China, and there are strict limitations on discussing the private lives of Chinese leaders and corruption issues.

Despite censorship, many students from mainland China demonstrate incredible free-thinking abilities, suggesting that the system is more porous than often perceived.

Growing up in a dictatorship, I realized that accountability is a major issue in democracies, where bad actors can operate without consequence.

The conversation around AI models often includes concerns about censorship and alignment, especially regarding sensitive historical events like Tiananmen Square.

The censorship system in China is subtle; while books can be purchased, parts that connect ideas to the government are often removed, reflecting a complex form of control.