When I read the script for Ex Machina, I had to imagine the imagery since it didn't exist yet; the characters, especially Nathan, were vividly portrayed.

The gel used to depict Ava's brain in Ex Machina was a good choice, as we currently lack the technology to create lifelike artificial intelligence like hers.

Alex Garland, the writer and director of Ex Machina, describes the film as set ten minutes into the future, reflecting a world very similar to ours.

The ending of Ex Machina leaves many questions unanswered, such as whether Ava is truly conscious or just a machine, emphasizing the film's ambiguity about AI and consciousness. It is intentionally vague, leaving viewers questioning the consciousness of the AI character, Ava.

The evolution of AI in film has shifted from utopian visions to more dystopian narratives, reflecting societal fears and concerns about technology.

Every movie has a timeline, a ticking clock that creates urgency, making the audience aware that the story won't unfold over years, as seen in 'Escape from New York'.

One of my favorite lines in Ex Machina is when Caleb points out that the real Turing test doesn't reveal whether the entity is human or machine, highlighting the film's exploration of consciousness.

In Ex Machina, the portrayal of AI is influenced by the need to create a compelling narrative, often depicting AI as a nemesis or a human-like entity, which may not reflect the reality of AI development.

In the film Ex Machina, the embodiment of AI is crucial, as it explores the philosophical implications of human attraction and empathy towards artificial intelligence.