Having a four-person co-founder team and maintaining engagement from all members over the years is rare, but our strong interpersonal dynamics contributed to our stability.

It's generally better to have a founding team of two or three people rather than a solo founder, as this allows for a broader skill set and the ability to compensate for each other's weaknesses.

It's generally more effective to have a founding team of two or three people rather than relying on a solo founder, as this allows for a broader skill set and the ability to compensate for each other's weaknesses.

We were all friends and had worked together before, which made us confident that our co-founding team was the right fit for building something long-term.

It's important to have co-founders who cover different skill sets and trust each other, as this foundation is crucial for navigating the challenges of building a startup.

Many successful co-founders have strong relationships that help them persist through challenges, unlike many companies that face insurmountable disagreements.

Founders need to be solidly aligned, and a startup has a better chance of success with a limited number of founders; too many can complicate decision-making.

It's better to have no co-founder than a bad one; many successful startups have thrived with just the founders in the early stages, emphasizing the importance of careful selection.

Having co-founders isn't always necessary; some single founders can take their companies far without partners.