I see various models emerging for digital art sales, including using blockchain to verify originality, but no single model has gained widespread acceptance yet.

In the cutthroat art industry, only a few artists can make a living, and those who succeed have learned to market and promote themselves effectively.

Many artists fail because they think promoting their work sullies its value, but successful artists understand the importance of marketing themselves.

If you want to generate art in the style of a living artist, our current model won't allow that, but we are exploring a new model where artists can opt in and receive revenue.

Artists possess the same entrepreneurial skills expected of successful tech founders, especially illustrators who leverage social media to build their brands and generate significant revenue.

Digital scarcity, like that of Bitcoin, is as important as digital abundance, allowing for the transmission of value through the internet.

Independent artists are one of the fastest growing sectors in the music industry, yet they remain underserved in terms of technology and services.

The generative art world is evolving, and while some people may push back against it, it's okay if not everyone likes it.

The distribution of wealth in crypto is often concentrated among a few early adopters, which raises concerns about fairness and value creation.