It's common for founders to hear the same reasons for rejection from multiple investors, which can indicate a broader issue that needs to be addressed rather than a specific flaw.

Founders sometimes mistakenly believe they should sell to startups just because other successful companies did, without understanding the unique challenges involved.

It's common for investors to change their minds about a founder after seeing significant progress, as initial rejections can be based on early impressions that may not reflect the founder's true potential.

As a founder, it's important to believe the 'no' from investors but not necessarily the reasons behind it, as they often lack transparency.

Founders often ignore the reality of their startup's potential failure, which is an uncomfortable truth to discuss.

Young founders often prioritize what investors want over solving problems they genuinely care about, which can hinder their potential.

A common misconception among founders is that raising money will magically solve all their problems. They may believe that their investors will save them from failure, which leads to a lack of critical thinking and preparation for ongoing challenges.

Investors evaluate founders by comparing them to previous successful ones, and a rejection can occur if a founder doesn't match that pattern or ranks lower than others currently pitching.

Founders often make excuses when asked direct questions about their startup's challenges, creating complicated narratives that place blame on external factors instead of taking responsibility for their growth and customer acquisition.