Two pillars of world order have been effectively demolished, serving only as ideological weapons, yet people should still defend and fight for these ideals, as they are not the end of the road.

The three foundational systems of world order established after World War II are the Human Rights Regime, the International Political Order articulated in the United Nations Charter, and the International Economic System, often referred to as the Bretton Woods System.

The conflicts over the principles of world order constitute a significant part of modern history, particularly post-Cold War history, and should be analyzed as such.

The voices that dominate discussions about world order are typically those of the rich and powerful, while the voices of the marginalized and oppressed are often silenced or ignored.

Destroying trust in institutions can lead to either anarchy or dictatorship, as societies rely on these structures for stability and order.

The elite institutions, including universities, are facing a crisis of legitimacy as they struggle to adapt to the changing beliefs of the populace, leading to internal conflicts about their direction.

The dismantling of the Bretton Woods System since the 1970s has led to economic slowdown and increased inequality, contrasting sharply with the previous Golden Age of Post-War Capitalism.

Deregulation of capital is seen as a weapon against democracy and socioeconomic rights, which is why capital controls were part of the Bretton Woods System.

To advocate for these ideals in the United States, one must first liberate themselves from prevailing doctrines and be willing to subject them to empirical verification.