The principles articulated in the foundational systems of world order were distasteful to elite elements who sought to dismantle or attenuate them.

We've just passed the 50th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is one of the pillars of the world order established after World War II.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights integrates civil, political, socioeconomic, and solidarity rights, emphasizing that all rights are fundamental and cannot be relegated to secondary status based on cultural relativism. At the end of the Second World War, values expressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights were deeply entrenched in anti-fascist movements across Europe, which disturbed US elites aiming to create a different world order.

The conflicts over the principles of world order constitute a significant part of modern history, particularly post-Cold War history, and should be analyzed as such.

Two pillars of world order have been effectively demolished, serving only as ideological weapons, yet people should still defend and fight for these ideals, as they are not the end of the road.

The dismantling of the Bretton Woods System since the 1970s has led to economic slowdown and increased inequality, contrasting sharply with the previous Golden Age of Post-War Capitalism.

The voices that dominate discussions about world order are typically those of the rich and powerful, while the voices of the marginalized and oppressed are often silenced or ignored.

The questions surrounding world order are not abstract; they involve real issues of life, death, suffering, and despair.

Modern wars are no longer just about resources; they encompass various conflicts across different domains, and international organizations are struggling to fulfill their roles effectively.