The principles articulated in the foundational systems of world order were distasteful to elite elements who sought to dismantle or attenuate them.

Modern wars are no longer just about resources; they encompass various conflicts across different domains, and international organizations are struggling to fulfill their roles effectively.

Two pillars of world order have been effectively demolished, serving only as ideological weapons, yet people should still defend and fight for these ideals, as they are not the end of the road.

The three foundational systems of world order established after World War II are the Human Rights Regime, the International Political Order articulated in the United Nations Charter, and the International Economic System, often referred to as the Bretton Woods System.

Using World War II as a reference for modern conflicts is problematic because it prevents us from seeing our enemies as real people with genuine grievances, which is essential for understanding the complexities of war.

The Cold War served as a unifying force for the United States, maintaining elite consensus; its end has led to political fraying and actions outside previously accepted norms. After the Cold War, there has been a struggle to find a new unifying enemy for the United States, but nothing has matched the significance of that era.

The conflict of ideas is central to warfare, and understanding this can lead to better strategies than just physical force.

The questions surrounding world order are not abstract; they involve real issues of life, death, suffering, and despair.

The narrative surrounding World War II is often weaponized in modern political discourse, leading to trivialization of its complexities and justifications for current conflicts.