New founders often feel the need to hire more employees to gain status, while experienced founders prefer smaller teams to avoid the challenges of managing larger companies.

It's generally more effective to have a founding team of two or three people rather than relying on a solo founder, as this allows for a broader skill set and the ability to compensate for each other's weaknesses.

The best products come from small teams of 4 to 6 people, rather than large teams, which can dilute focus and creativity.

It's generally better to have a founding team of two or three people rather than a solo founder, as this allows for a broader skill set and the ability to compensate for each other's weaknesses.

Many smart individuals are not suited to be founders because they avoid the hard, manual work required in the early stages of a startup.

I believe in the power of small teams; they can execute projects more effectively without the dilution of culture that comes with rapid team growth.

Founders need to be solidly aligned, and a startup has a better chance of success with a limited number of founders; too many can complicate decision-making.

When hiring, prioritize finding the best people and be proud of how much you can accomplish with a small team, as having too many employees can lead to complexity and inefficiency.

Founders who start with a small team often learn to view their company as a product that needs to be engineered, which includes effectively managing people as resources.