The military-industrial complex profits from ongoing conflicts, complicating efforts for peace and de-escalation.

The conflict of ideas is central to warfare, and understanding this can lead to better strategies than just physical force.

Dual-use technology in logistics allows for collaboration between the military and commercial sectors, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness.

The relationship between India and China is not new, and I believe we can reinvigorate our friendship to deescalate tensions, as both nations have ancient cultures and civilizations that have significantly contributed to global good throughout history, with records suggesting they once accounted for over 50% of the world’s GDP.

The military-industrial complex's influence extends beyond just profit; it shapes public sentiment and policy, complicating peace efforts.

The recent conflict with the Houthis in Yemen shows that sometimes a diplomatic solution is more effective than military action, as evidenced by the ceasefire that led to a reduction in attacks.

The U.S. trade deficit is significantly influenced by China, accounting for about half of the problem, which complicates the geopolitical landscape.

The cost of winning, in terms of human capital drained from other countries, can lead to geopolitical instability, and we actually want these countries to be strong for global cooperation.

Conflict delayed is conflict multiplied; addressing issues promptly can prevent them from escalating and becoming more complex.