Equity splits among founders should generally be more or less equal to avoid future conflicts, as significant mismatches can lead to resentment and issues down the line.

Aim for close to equal equity splits among co-founders to maintain motivation and prevent resentment.

It's advisable to split equity equally between co-founders to ensure both feel equally invested in the startup's success.

When deciding on equity, start with a 50-50 split, as both co-founders are likely to contribute equally at the beginning stages of the startup.

Equity splits should maximize the motivation of your co-founders to stay committed to the company over the long term.

Co-founders should decide on the equity split early in their partnership, ideally soon after they start working together, and it should be near equal.

In cases of unequal equity splits, a common mistake is assuming that one co-founder deserves a significantly larger share simply because of an agreement, which can lead to imbalances and conflicts.

In a startup with multiple founders, equity allocation should ideally be equal to avoid potential conflicts and ensure trust among the team.

If one co-founder has been working on the idea longer, it may be reasonable to adjust the equity split, but avoid short-term optimization that could harm long-term motivation.