The argument for high-skilled immigration is straightforward: it allows the U.S. to attract smart individuals from around the world, enhancing productivity and innovation across industries.

The exclusion of native-born individuals from high-skilled jobs and educational opportunities is a consequence of high-skilled immigration policies.

The H-1B visa debate reflects broader concerns about immigration and its impact on the economy and workforce, and I have a nuanced view on high-skilled immigration, shaped by my experiences in Silicon Valley and my advocacy for more H-1B visas, which I believe have significantly benefited the U.S.

There are no moral arguments against high-skilled immigration; opposing it often stems from racism or xenophobia.

The biggest roadblock to making hiring more inclusive is the misconception that software alone can solve the problem without addressing deeper cultural issues. More companies are increasingly prioritizing diversity and inclusion, recognizing it as essential rather than optional.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are essential, but there's been backlash against them, especially in big tech, which we need to address.

Access to talent is a major issue; we need to ensure that high-skilled individuals can enter the U.S. to build companies, as the current process is not straightforward.

High-skilled immigrants not only benefit themselves and the tech industry but also create new companies and technologies that generate jobs for native-born Americans.

In corporate America, discussions about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) often revolve around ideology, and many leaders feel pressured by universities to adopt these ideologies.