In cases of unequal equity splits, a common mistake is assuming that one co-founder deserves a significantly larger share simply because of an agreement, which can lead to imbalances and conflicts.

Being more generous with equity for co-founders is beneficial, as it fosters long-term motivation to stay committed to the startup, especially during challenging times.

If you don't establish vesting for co-founders, a fallout can lead to dead weight on your equity table, making it hard to attract investors.

Being generous with co-founder equity is crucial because co-founders provide the initial energy and activation needed for the company to succeed, especially in the early years.

You should be generous with equity to founders and early employees to foster a sense of ownership and commitment.

I should be more generous with equity to ensure my co-founder remains motivated when challenges arise.

Founders should be generous with equity for early employees, as they are the ones who build the company over time.

The biggest risk for a startup is the founders becoming discouraged and burning out, which can be exacerbated by tying personal worth to the company's success.

Founders often make the mistake of focusing on past contributions during equity discussions instead of considering future work and potential.